[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb][AIX] Added XCOFF ParseSymtab handling (PR #141577)

David Spickett via lldb-commits lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu May 29 05:38:39 PDT 2025


================
@@ -188,7 +188,74 @@ AddressClass ObjectFileXCOFF::GetAddressClass(addr_t file_addr) {
   return AddressClass::eUnknown;
 }
 
-void ObjectFileXCOFF::ParseSymtab(Symtab &lldb_symtab) {}
+lldb::SymbolType MapSymbolType(llvm::object::SymbolRef::Type sym_type) {
+  if (sym_type == llvm::object::SymbolRef::ST_Function)
+    return lldb::eSymbolTypeCode;
+  else if (sym_type == llvm::object::SymbolRef::ST_Data)
+    return lldb::eSymbolTypeData;
+  else if (sym_type == llvm::object::SymbolRef::ST_File)
+    return lldb::eSymbolTypeSourceFile;
+  return lldb::eSymbolTypeInvalid;
+}
+
+void ObjectFileXCOFF::ParseSymtab(Symtab &lldb_symtab) {
+  SectionList *sectionList = GetSectionList();
+
+  for (const auto &symbol_ref : m_binary->symbols()) {
+    llvm::object::XCOFFSymbolRef xcoff_sym_ref(symbol_ref);
+    llvm::Expected<llvm::StringRef> name_or_err = xcoff_sym_ref.getName();
+    if (!name_or_err) {
+      consumeError(name_or_err.takeError());
+      continue;
+    }
+    llvm::StringRef symbolName = name_or_err.get();
+    // Remove the dot prefix for demangle
+    llvm::StringRef symbol_name =
+        symbolName.starts_with(".") ? symbolName.drop_front() : symbolName;
+    auto storageClass = xcoff_sym_ref.getStorageClass();
+    if (storageClass == XCOFF::C_HIDEXT && symbolName != "TOC") {
+      if (xcoff_sym_ref.getNumberOfAuxEntries() != 1)
+        continue;
+      auto aux_csect_or_err = xcoff_sym_ref.getXCOFFCsectAuxRef();
+      if (!aux_csect_or_err) {
+        consumeError(aux_csect_or_err.takeError());
+        continue;
+      }
+      const llvm::object::XCOFFCsectAuxRef csect_aux = aux_csect_or_err.get();
+      if (csect_aux.getStorageMappingClass() != XCOFF::XMC_PR ||
+          (m_binary->is64Bit() ? (csect_aux.getAuxType64() != XCOFF::AUX_CSECT)
+                               : false))
+        continue;
----------------
DavidSpickett wrote:

Yes please, my reaction was "this looks very clever but needs to be refactored" :)

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141577


More information about the lldb-commits mailing list