[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb-dap] Adjusting startup flow to better handle async operations. (PR #140299)

[Jonas Devlieghere via lldb-commits]

JDevlieghere wrote:

One more thing that comes to mind: how confident are we that all existing clients send the launch/attach in parallel with the configuration requests? If we implement what you suggest, we risk a potential deadlock when a client waits for the launch/attach to complete before sending configuration requests or inversely, if the client waits for the initialized event before sending the launch/attach.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140299