[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb-dap] Change the launch sequence (PR #138219)

Jonas Devlieghere via lldb-commits lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri May 2 11:46:00 PDT 2025


================
@@ -893,10 +893,23 @@ llvm::Error DAP::Loop() {
             return errWrapper;
           }
 
+          // The launch sequence is special and we need to carefully handle
+          // packets in the right order. The launch and attach requests cannot
+          // be answered until we've gotten the confgigurationDone request. We
+          // can't answer the threads request until we've successfully launched
+          // or attached.
+          bool is_part_of_launch_sequence = false;
----------------
JDevlieghere wrote:

I like that idea. We can't quite move everything over to the other queue, because the following requests can be made between the initialize and configuration done request:

> In response to the initialized event, the development tool sends the configuration information using these requests:
> 
> [setBreakpoints](https://microsoft.github.io/debug-adapter-protocol/specification#Requests_SetBreakpoints) one request for all breakpoints in a single source,
> [setFunctionBreakpoints](https://microsoft.github.io/debug-adapter-protocol/specification#Requests_SetFunctionBreakpoints) if the debug adapter supports function breakpoints,
> [setExceptionBreakpoints](https://microsoft.github.io/debug-adapter-protocol/specification#Requests_SetExceptionBreakpoints) if the debug adapter supports any exception options,
> [configurationDoneRequest](https://microsoft.github.io/debug-adapter-protocol/specification#Requests_ConfigurationDone) to indicate the end of the configuration sequence.

But limiting the ones that can be made is definitely more robust than what we're doing now!

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138219


More information about the lldb-commits mailing list