[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb] Support alternatives for scope format entries (PR #137751)

[Jonas Devlieghere via lldb-commits]

JDevlieghere wrote:

@labath this ended up quite different from the bash-like syntax that we discussed at EuroLLVM [1]. Using a single character keeps the parsing code simple and limiting this to scopes eliminates some design complexity like recursion. The current implementation covers all of my uses cases and I think you can almost (?) always use a scope when you want to have an alternative value. Please let me know what you think. 

[1] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137408#issuecomment-2834705929

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137751