[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb] Highlight basenames in backtraces (PR #137301)

Michael Buch via lldb-commits lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Apr 28 06:53:38 PDT 2025


Michael137 wrote:

> Maybe we should say that if the name is not mangled, the entire string is the name of the function (and so it should be highlighted)?

That could work. Just need to audit in which cases we might set a demangled name without specifying it's mangled name too. If the demangled name happens to include arguments/return types/etc., highlighting those may get confusing. But not sure that ever happens

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137301


More information about the lldb-commits mailing list