[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb] Highlight basenames in backtraces (PR #137301)
Michael Buch via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Apr 28 06:53:38 PDT 2025
Michael137 wrote:
> Maybe we should say that if the name is not mangled, the entire string is the name of the function (and so it should be highlighted)?
That could work. Just need to audit in which cases we might set a demangled name without specifying it's mangled name too. If the demangled name happens to include arguments/return types/etc., highlighting those may get confusing. But not sure that ever happens
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137301
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list