[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb][CPlusPlus] Always use CPlusPlusNameParser for parsing C++ function names (PR #137072)

[Michael Buch via lldb-commits]

Michael137 wrote:

> Yeah, getting some numbers would be nice. Maybe just repeating the benchmark in that diff. It might be a good idea to do it with and without the accelerator tables, just to rule out any effect from those.

Will do

On Darwin (without accelerator tables and statically linked Clang) I don't see this codepath being hit at all when setting a named breakpoint. If the function name doesn't exist we don't seem to call `CxxMethodName` at all. If the name does exist we hit it a couple of times (~10). I'll try on Linux too 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137072