[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb] Make ValueObjectDynamicValue::UpdateValue() point to a host b… (PR #125143)

[via lldb-commits]

jimingham wrote:

This is a little weird - why would the value of a ValueObject when interpreted as its Dynamic Value ever be in host memory?  That seems odd, made doubly so because it's unused in the current sources.  So I really worry about this getting broken.

Would it be possible to cons up a unittest that makes this artificially?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125143