[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb] Store the command in the CommandReturnObject (PR #125132)

[via lldb-commits]

jimingham wrote:

This looks good.  I wonder if we ought to do something a little less ad hoc about the cases where our command return objects are from HandleCommands, so they won't necessarily have the result of a single command.  In the case where a UI is parsing these, it might very well need to know that fact.  They all currently have `<>` around the command name, but sadly we don't outlaw `<` as the initial character of a command, so you can't 100% tell from that. 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125132