[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb] Fix "in function" detection in "thread until" (PR #123622)
via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jan 29 10:46:00 PST 2025
================
@@ -1007,29 +1009,29 @@ class CommandObjectThreadUntil : public CommandObjectParsed {
addr_t address =
line_entry.range.GetBaseAddress().GetLoadAddress(target);
if (address != LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS) {
- if (fun_addr_range.ContainsLoadAddress(address, target))
+ AddressRange unused;
+ if (sc.function->GetRangeContainingLoadAddress(address, *target,
+ unused))
address_list.push_back(address);
- else
- all_in_function = false;
}
start_idx_ptr++;
}
}
for (lldb::addr_t address : m_options.m_until_addrs) {
- if (fun_addr_range.ContainsLoadAddress(address, target))
+ AddressRange unused;
+ if (sc.function->GetRangeContainingLoadAddress(address, *target,
+ unused))
address_list.push_back(address);
- else
- all_in_function = false;
}
if (address_list.empty()) {
----------------
jimingham wrote:
Since you only care here about `found_something` and `address_list.size > 0` could you short-circuit this search when you find the first address that matches the line?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123622
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list