[Lldb-commits] [clang] [lldb] [lldb] Analyze enum promotion type during parsing (PR #115005)
Ilia Kuklin via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jan 27 10:28:04 PST 2025
================
@@ -2367,11 +2369,38 @@ size_t DWARFASTParserClang::ParseChildEnumerators(
}
if (name && name[0] && got_value) {
- m_ast.AddEnumerationValueToEnumerationType(
+ auto ECD = m_ast.AddEnumerationValueToEnumerationType(
clang_type, decl, name, enum_value, enumerator_byte_size * 8);
++enumerators_added;
+
+ llvm::APSInt InitVal = ECD->getInitVal();
+ // Keep track of the size of positive and negative values.
+ if (InitVal.isUnsigned() || InitVal.isNonNegative()) {
+ // If the enumerator is zero that should still be counted as a positive
+ // bit since we need a bit to store the value zero.
+ unsigned ActiveBits = InitVal.getActiveBits();
+ NumPositiveBits = std::max({NumPositiveBits, ActiveBits, 1u});
+ } else {
+ NumNegativeBits =
+ std::max(NumNegativeBits, (unsigned)InitVal.getSignificantBits());
----------------
kuilpd wrote:
This one is for when the value is just signed negative, can be anything, accumulates over all enum values.
This if/else is from [SemaDecl.cpp:L20084](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/5d6d982df61d16b6d498e6d59dd91c059679d3d8/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp#L20084), but I don't think this few lines are worth putting into a separate function as well.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115005
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list