[Lldb-commits] [clang] [lldb] [lldb] Analyze enum promotion type during parsing (PR #115005)

Ilia Kuklin via lldb-commits lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jan 27 10:28:04 PST 2025


================
@@ -2367,11 +2369,38 @@ size_t DWARFASTParserClang::ParseChildEnumerators(
     }
 
     if (name && name[0] && got_value) {
-      m_ast.AddEnumerationValueToEnumerationType(
+      auto ECD = m_ast.AddEnumerationValueToEnumerationType(
           clang_type, decl, name, enum_value, enumerator_byte_size * 8);
       ++enumerators_added;
+
+      llvm::APSInt InitVal = ECD->getInitVal();
+      // Keep track of the size of positive and negative values.
+      if (InitVal.isUnsigned() || InitVal.isNonNegative()) {
+        // If the enumerator is zero that should still be counted as a positive
+        // bit since we need a bit to store the value zero.
+        unsigned ActiveBits = InitVal.getActiveBits();
+        NumPositiveBits = std::max({NumPositiveBits, ActiveBits, 1u});
+      } else {
+        NumNegativeBits =
+            std::max(NumNegativeBits, (unsigned)InitVal.getSignificantBits());
----------------
kuilpd wrote:

This one is for when the value is just signed negative, can be anything, accumulates over all enum values.
This if/else is from [SemaDecl.cpp:L20084](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/5d6d982df61d16b6d498e6d59dd91c059679d3d8/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp#L20084), but I don't think this few lines are worth putting into a separate function as well.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115005


More information about the lldb-commits mailing list