[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb] Implement basic support for reverse-continue (PR #112079)

[Robert O'Callahan via lldb-commits]

rocallahan wrote:

> I still feel like it would be better to have a way to ask up front if the process supports reverse continue and shortcut attempts to do so as early as possible (e.g. if you ask a command to reverse continue and the process doesn't support it, we should return with an error right away and not do any more work.) But if you really feel that this will over-complicate the design, I'll be content with expressing my sentiments this one more time...

I don't have strong feelings about it. I made my case, you still prefer an early check, so I've implemented it. I added it as an extra commit so you can make sure it's what you had in mind.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112079