[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb] Reduce the frequency of DWARF index progress reporting (PR #118953)

[Pavel Labath via lldb-commits]

labath wrote:

> What is the resolution if we switch to "time since epoch" in an atomic value? Can we use some casting to cast a double back into a uint64_t for storage in an atomic?
> 

That's not a problem. I was referring to the time_point::time_since_epoch() (which returns arbitrary precision), not the unix "seconds since epoch" concept. I've created an alternative implementation in #119377

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118953