[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [LLDB] Add framework for Data Inspection Language (DIL) work. (PR #115666)

[Pavel Labath via lldb-commits]

================
@@ -304,6 +304,42 @@ class StackFrame : public ExecutionContextScope,
   ///
   /// \return
   ///     A shared pointer to the ValueObject described by var_expr.
+  lldb::ValueObjectSP LegacyGetValueForVariableExpressionPath(
+      llvm::StringRef var_expr, lldb::DynamicValueType use_dynamic,
+      uint32_t options, lldb::VariableSP &var_sp, Status &error);
+
+  /// Create a ValueObject for a variable name / pathname, possibly including
+  /// simple dereference/child selection syntax.
+  ///
+  /// \param[in] var_expr
+  ///     The string specifying a variable to base the VariableObject off
+  ///     of.
+  ///
+  /// \param[in] use_dynamic
+  ///     Whether the correct dynamic type of an object pointer should be
+  ///     determined before creating the object, or if the static type is
+  ///     sufficient.  One of the DynamicValueType enumerated values.
+  ///
+  /// \param[in] options
+  ///     An unsigned integer of flags, values from
+  ///     StackFrame::ExpressionPathOption
+  ///     enum.
+  /// \param[in] var_sp
+  ///     A VariableSP that will be set to the variable described in the
+  ///     var_expr path.
+  ///
+  /// \param[in] error
+  ///     Record any errors encountered while evaluating var_expr.
+  ///
+  /// \return
+  ///     A shared pointer to the ValueObject described by var_expr.
+  lldb::ValueObjectSP DILGetValueForVariableExpressionPath(
----------------
labath wrote:

Can these be private (they should only be called from the dispatcher function, right)?

(You can attach the doxygen comment to the public function, there's no need to repeat it everywhere)

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115666