[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb] Implement basic support for reverse-continue (PR #112079)

[Pavel Labath via lldb-commits]

labath wrote:

FWIW, I also think that having "continue" go sometimes backwards would be very confusing. If we only have forward execution, then the difference between "run forwards" and "resume the current thread plan (forwards)" is not big. However, the difference between "run forwards" and "resume current plan **backwards**" is huge, and I think we should avoid the possibility of confusing the two (for example, by requiring an explicit direction argument if the current thread plan wants to go backwards).

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112079