[Lldb-commits] [lldb] DynamicLoaderDarwin load images in parallel (PR #110439)

[Dmitrii Galimzianov via lldb-commits]

DmT021 wrote:

> I think that's where the real perf difference you were measuring kicked in (you showed a 10.5 second versus 13.4 second time difference for preload versus parallel in the beginning), do I have that right?

That's right.

> Do you prefer the non-preload approach? 

No, I think we should stick to a more general approach unless we have to perform the loading itself differently for the special modules. And currently, we don't have any difference between loading them and all the other - the calls to `FindTargetModuleForImageInfo` are all the same. So I'm in favor of the preload variant.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110439