[Lldb-commits] [lldb] Add docs describing how the thread plan stack affects stepping (PR #110167)

[Felipe de Azevedo Piovezan via lldb-commits]

================
@@ -536,6 +536,33 @@ This command will run the thread in the current frame until it reaches line 100
 in this frame or stops if it leaves the current frame. This is a pretty close
 equivalent to GDB's ``until`` command.
 
+One other useful thing to note about the lldb stepping commands is that they
+are implemented as a stack of interruptible operations.  Until the operation -
+e.g. step to the next line - is completed, the operation will remain on the
+stack.  If it is interrupted, new stepping commands will result in their
+operations being pushed onto the stack, each of them retired as they are completed.
+
+Suppose, for instance, you ``step-over`` a source line, and hit a breakpoint
+in a function called by the code of the line you are stepping over.  Since the step-over
+operation remains on the stack, you can examine the state at
+the point of the breakpoint hit, step around in that frame, step in to other
+frames, hit other breakpoints, etc.  Then when you are done, a simple ``continue``
+will resume the original ``step-over`` operation, only ending when the desired line is reached.
+This saves you from having to manually issue some number of ``step-out`` commands
+to get back to the frame you were stepping over.
+
+Hand-called functions using the ``expr`` command are also implemented by
+operations on this same stack.  So if you are calling some code with the ``expr`` command,
+and hit a breakpoint during the evaluation of that code, you can examine
+the state where you stopped, step around at your convenience, and then issue a
+``continue`` which will finish the expression evaluation operation and print the function
+result.
+
+You can examine the state of the operations stack using the ``thread plan list``
+command, and if, for instance, you decide you don't actually want that outermost
+next to continue running, you can remove it with the ``thread plan discard``
+command.
+
----------------
felipepiovezan wrote:

Do you mean the `step` channel? There is a lot of detailed output there, I'm not sure we want the average `tutorial.rst` reader to be pointed that way...

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110167