[Lldb-commits] [lldb] ObjectFileJSON and Section changes to support section.address field i… (PR #101062)

[Ilhan Raja via lldb-commits]

YungRaj wrote:

> > I was hoping to fix everything in one Pull Request so that it at least becomes usable once this merges.
> 
> The LLVM project generally [prefers](https://llvm.org/docs/CodeReview.html#code-reviews-speed-and-reciprocity) smaller patches as they're easier to review. We'll definitely want to fix the end-to-end issue and have a test, but the deserialization issue can stand on its own and deserves its own PR.

Sounds good. Will divide the pull requests into multiple of them.

So I tried to get symbolicating backtraces working, however, this is a bit more challenging, because LLVM doesn't have a good intuition of building a proper bound from start to finish of a function. It's not that I couldn't get addresses to symbolicate, but many functions that get symbolicated are actually from functions before it that had the subsequent function unsymbolicated.


@JDevlieghere do you believe there is a way to fix LLDB's intuition of the proper bounds of functions based on function prologues (e.g. `BTI`, `PACIBSP`, `STP X29, X30, [SP, #-offset]!` on arm64) and epilogues (`RET`, `RETAB`, etc on arm64) 



https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101062