[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb] Implement basic support for reverse-continue (PR #99736)

[via lldb-commits]

jimingham wrote:



> On Jul 22, 2024, at 3:44 PM, rocallahan ***@***.***> wrote:
> 
> 
> You might have to be careful in the case where someone runs a function call, stops at a breakpoint in the function call and decides to go backwards in the function execution (if that's possible).
> 
> That is not possible in rr. During user function calls it responds to reverse execution requests with an immediate stop.
> 
So long as you haven't pruned the plans that control the function call before doing that, you should be fine.

Jim



> —
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99736#issuecomment-2243935756>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADUPVW7T7QNKD3CRL3QOOSLZNWDLPAVCNFSM6AAAAABLFTBQAKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDENBTHEZTKNZVGY>.
> You are receiving this because you are on a team that was mentioned.
> 



https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99736