[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb] SHT_NOBITS sections type (PR #99044)

[via lldb-commits]

dlav-sc wrote:

> > I have also removed `.Cases(".bss", ".tbss", eSectionTypeZeroFill)`.
> > To be honest, I'm not sure about that. .bss and .tbss have SHT_NOBITS type and SHF_ALLOC flag by [Linux Specification](https://refspecs.linuxbase.org/LSB_3.1.1/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/specialsections.html), but anyway I have doubts.
> 
> I know what you mean -- you can find very strange elf files out there. However, most elf tools operate on section flags (that's what they're for) and not their names, so I really doubt that e.g. treating a SHT_PROGBITS+SHF_ALLOC section that happens to be called ".bss" as `eSectionTypeZeroFill` is the right behavior.
> 
> So, until proven otherwise, this looks good to me.

Well, sounds reasonable.
Thanks for the review.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99044