[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb] Refactor TypeQuery::ContextMatches (PR #99305)
Pavel Labath via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jul 18 07:24:13 PDT 2024
================
@@ -153,19 +127,89 @@ void TypeQuery::SetLanguages(LanguageSet languages) {
bool TypeQuery::ContextMatches(
llvm::ArrayRef<CompilerContext> context_chain) const {
- if (GetExactMatch() || context_chain.size() == m_context.size())
- return ::contextMatches(context_chain, m_context);
-
- // We don't have an exact match, we need to bottom m_context.size() items to
- // match for a successful lookup.
- if (context_chain.size() < m_context.size())
- return false; // Not enough items in context_chain to allow for a match.
-
- size_t compare_count = context_chain.size() - m_context.size();
- return ::contextMatches(
- llvm::ArrayRef<CompilerContext>(context_chain.data() + compare_count,
- m_context.size()),
- m_context);
+ auto ctx = context_chain.rbegin(), ctx_end = context_chain.rend();
+ for (auto pat = m_context.rbegin(), pat_end = m_context.rend();
+ pat != pat_end;) {
+
+ // Handle AnyModule matches. These are tricky as they can match any number
----------------
labath wrote:
That's a very good question actually. I'm pretty sure we're not using it. I assumed it was being used for some Apple thing with -gmodules or whatever, but now mention that, it doesn't appear to be actually used except for some specialized tests.
So, as much as I loved implementing a glob algorithm, I would love even more to delete it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99305
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list