[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [llvm] [lldb][RISCV] function calls support in lldb expressions (PR #99336)

[David Spickett via lldb-commits]

DavidSpickett wrote:

> Thanks for the patches (if we end up going down this route you'll probably want to split out the LLVM JIT changes into a separate PR).

I know little about the JIT side but this is my first reaction too. I wonder if that has its own tests that need adding, and it'll get more expert eyes on it.

> without RISCV large code model, which has not been implemented yet

I presume the work to do this is much greater than the work shown here?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99336