[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb][API] Add Find(Ranges)InMemory() to Process SB API (PR #95007)
Greg Clayton via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jun 10 10:29:02 PDT 2024
================
@@ -810,6 +809,112 @@ const char *SBProcess::GetBroadcasterClass() {
return ConstString(Process::GetStaticBroadcasterClass()).AsCString();
}
+lldb::SBAddressRangeList
+SBProcess::FindRangesInMemory(const void *buf, uint64_t size,
+ SBAddressRangeList &ranges, uint32_t alignment,
+ uint32_t max_matches) {
+ LLDB_INSTRUMENT_VA(this, buf, size, ranges, alignment, max_matches);
+
+ Log *log = GetLog(LLDBLog::Process);
+ lldb::SBAddressRangeList matches;
+
+ if (alignment == 0) {
+ LLDB_LOGF(log, "SBProcess::%s allignmet is 0, Must be greater than 0.",
+ __FUNCTION__);
+ return matches;
+ }
+
+ if (buf == nullptr) {
+ LLDB_LOGF(log, "SBProcess::%s provided 'buffer' is nullptr.", __FUNCTION__);
+ return matches;
+ }
+
+ if (size == 0) {
+ LLDB_LOGF(log, "SBProcess::%s buffer size is 0.", __FUNCTION__);
+ return matches;
+ }
+
+ if (ranges.GetSize() == 0) {
+ LLDB_LOGF(log, "SBProcess::%s provided 'range' is invalid.", __FUNCTION__);
+ return matches;
+ }
----------------
clayborg wrote:
We should do error checking / logging in one place. Right now we are doing the same checks here and also down the the `lldb_private::Process` methods. We should do them only in `lldb_private::Process` and just let this function call that function and let it do the checking.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95007
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list