[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb] Add RegisterContextPOSIXCore for RISC-V 64 (PR #93297)
David Spickett via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri May 31 04:04:35 PDT 2024
================
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+//===-- RegisterContextPOSIXCore_riscv64.cpp ------------------------------===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "RegisterContextPOSIXCore_riscv64.h"
+
+#include "lldb/Utility/DataBufferHeap.h"
+
+using namespace lldb_private;
+
+std::unique_ptr<RegisterContextCorePOSIX_riscv64>
+RegisterContextCorePOSIX_riscv64::Create(
+ lldb_private::Thread &thread, const lldb_private::ArchSpec &arch,
+ const lldb_private::DataExtractor &gpregset,
+ llvm::ArrayRef<lldb_private::CoreNote> notes) {
+ Flags flags = 0;
+
+ auto register_info_up =
+ std::make_unique<RegisterInfoPOSIX_riscv64>(arch, flags);
+ return std::unique_ptr<RegisterContextCorePOSIX_riscv64>(
+ new RegisterContextCorePOSIX_riscv64(thread, std::move(register_info_up),
+ gpregset, notes));
+}
+
+RegisterContextCorePOSIX_riscv64::RegisterContextCorePOSIX_riscv64(
+ Thread &thread, std::unique_ptr<RegisterInfoPOSIX_riscv64> register_info,
+ const DataExtractor &gpregset, llvm::ArrayRef<CoreNote> notes)
+ : RegisterContextPOSIX_riscv64(thread, std::move(register_info)) {
+
+ m_gpr_buffer = std::make_shared<DataBufferHeap>(gpregset.GetDataStart(),
+ gpregset.GetByteSize());
+ m_gpr.SetData(m_gpr_buffer);
+ m_gpr.SetByteOrder(gpregset.GetByteOrder());
+
+ ArchSpec arch = m_register_info_up->GetTargetArchitecture();
+ DataExtractor fpregset = getRegset(notes, arch.GetTriple(), FPR_Desc);
+ m_fpr_buffer = std::make_shared<DataBufferHeap>(fpregset.GetDataStart(),
----------------
DavidSpickett wrote:
For obvious reasons, not a RISC-V expert, but Debian chose RV64GC (https://wiki.debian.org/RISC-V#Hardware_baseline_and_ABI_choice) which apparently converts to `RV64IMAFDCZicsr_Zifencei` and `F` is single precision floating point.
So I agree, it's reasonable for lldb to assume they exist. Certainly not a concern for this PR.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93297
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list