[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb] Improve identification of Dlang mangled names (PR #93881)

[via lldb-commits]

jimingham wrote:

> Also, something to keep in mind: If Dlang ever decides to change their mangled name scheme in the future, this change may become wrong then. I'm not sure what commitments the D language project has for their ABI stability though.

That's why this shouldn't be in lldb in the long run, we should ask the D demangler in llvm (if we don't have a D demangler then we should just be ignoring D mangled symbols).  We can't guarantee we'll grok anything newer than the D in your lldb, but that seems reasonable.  But that way we wouldn't have to track this in lldb.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93881