[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb] Improve identification of Dlang mangled names (PR #93881)

[via lldb-commits]

github-actions[bot] wrote:

<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {darker}-->


:warning: Python code formatter, darker found issues in your code. :warning:

<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>

``````````bash
darker --check --diff -r f795853d1f77bff69c3805f75e54fa7a32cc23d9...21a61a1a5ae68fc1e913f73c4311258675990f95 lldb/test/API/lang/c/non-mangled/TestCNonMangled.py
``````````

</details>

<details>
<summary>
View the diff from darker here.
</summary>

``````````diff
--- TestCNonMangled.py	2024-05-30 21:19:48.000000 +0000
+++ TestCNonMangled.py	2024-05-30 21:22:59.864253 +0000
@@ -1,11 +1,10 @@
 import lldbsuite.test.lldbutil as lldbutil
 from lldbsuite.test.lldbtest import *
 
 
 class TestCase(TestBase):
-
     def test_functions_having_dlang_mangling_prefix(self):
         """
         Ensure C functions with a '_D' prefix alone are not mistakenly treated
         as a Dlang mangled name. A proper Dlang mangling will have digits
         immediately following the '_D' prefix.

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93881