[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb] Adds additional fields to ProcessInfo (PR #91544)

[Fred Grim via lldb-commits]

================
@@ -91,14 +87,16 @@ static bool GetStatusInfo(::pid_t Pid, ProcessInstanceInfo &ProcessInfo,
   if (Rest.empty())
     return false;
   StatFields stat_fields;
-  if (sscanf(Rest.data(),
-             "%d %s %c %d %d %d %d %d %u %lu %lu %lu %lu %lu %lu %ld %ld",
-             &stat_fields.pid, stat_fields.comm, &stat_fields.state,
-             &stat_fields.ppid, &stat_fields.pgrp, &stat_fields.session,
-             &stat_fields.tty_nr, &stat_fields.tpgid, &stat_fields.flags,
-             &stat_fields.minflt, &stat_fields.cminflt, &stat_fields.majflt,
-             &stat_fields.cmajflt, &stat_fields.utime, &stat_fields.stime,
-             &stat_fields.cutime, &stat_fields.cstime) < 0) {
+  if (sscanf(
+          Rest.data(),
+          "%d %s %c %d %d %d %d %d %u %lu %lu %lu %lu %lu %lu %ld %ld %ld %ld",
+          &stat_fields.pid, stat_fields.comm, &stat_fields.state,
+          &stat_fields.ppid, &stat_fields.pgrp, &stat_fields.session,
+          &stat_fields.tty_nr, &stat_fields.tpgid, &stat_fields.flags,
+          &stat_fields.minflt, &stat_fields.cminflt, &stat_fields.majflt,
+          &stat_fields.cmajflt, &stat_fields.utime, &stat_fields.stime,
+          &stat_fields.cutime, &stat_fields.cstime,
+          &stat_fields.realtime_priority, &stat_fields.priority) < 0) {
----------------
feg208 wrote:

from proc_pid_stat(5)
```
(18) priority  %ld
                     (Explanation for Linux 2.6) For processes running a real-time scheduling policy (policy below; see sched_setscheduler(2)), this is the negated scheduling priority, minus one; that is, a number in the range -2 to -100, corresponding to  real-time
                     priorities  1  to  99.   For processes running under a non-real-time scheduling policy, this is the raw nice value (setpriority(2)) as represented in the kernel.  The kernel stores nice values as numbers in the range 0 (high) to 39 (low), corre‐
                     sponding to the user-visible nice range of -20 to 19.

                     Before Linux 2.6, this was a scaled value based on the scheduler weighting given to this process.
```
so yes

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91544