[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb][Docs] Various style improvements to the tutorial (PR #90594)

[Jonas Devlieghere via lldb-commits]

JDevlieghere wrote:

> > Always refer to lldb as lldb not LLDB, to match what the user sees on the command line.
> 
> If this were any other doc I'd say it should always be LLDB and GDB as that's the projects' branding. In this doc I think it's better to imagine the user is looking at side by side command lines.

I'm not sure I follow that reasoning. In all fairness I might be biased as I try to consistently use "LLDB" unless I'm referring tot the binary or the prompt. Ignoring things like `(lldb)`, `lldb-` and `lldb.`, it looks like the docs favor "LLDB" as well.

```
$ rg 'LLDB' | wc -l
     605
$ rg 'lldb' | awk '!/\(lldb\)/ && !/lldb\./ && !/lldb-/' | wc -l
     362
```

Personally I'd lean towards more consistency. 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90594