[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [llvm] [mlir] Split the llvm::ThreadPool into an abstract base class and an implementation (PR #82094)

[Alexandre Ganea via lldb-commits]

================
@@ -227,7 +265,7 @@ class ThreadPool {
 class ThreadPoolTaskGroup {
----------------
aganea wrote:

That point was raised by the OP in the Discourse thread (allow for custom implementations of `ThreadPoolTaskGroup`) and I think it deserved a clear answer, and I do agree now to your point. Until there's no clear use-case, the behavior of `ThreadPoolTaskGroup` will remain as is, deferred to the `ThreadPool` implementation.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82094