[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb] Fix expressions that involve nested structs/classes/unions. (PR #77029)

[David Blaikie via lldb-commits]

dwblaikie wrote:

Be great to see D101950 picked up again, so I'm glad to hear that's being looked at.

Be nice to get some way to address this regression sooner rather than later... 

& yeah, I'd argue that classes derived from DWARF are not complete - nested types, member function templates, special member functions, and... static members I think - none of those things are consistently emitted in every copy of a type. So we probably shouldn't turn off the queries back into lldb for a type ever, really.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77029