[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb][DWARFASTParserClang][NFC] Clarify comment around static member variable handling (PR #72495)
via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Nov 16 00:47:58 PST 2023
llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Michael Buch (Michael137)
<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72495.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) lldb/source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/DWARFASTParserClang.cpp (+2-2)
``````````diff
diff --git a/lldb/source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/DWARFASTParserClang.cpp b/lldb/source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/DWARFASTParserClang.cpp
index 37efe70461977ad..abe3c673e2cce69 100644
--- a/lldb/source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/DWARFASTParserClang.cpp
+++ b/lldb/source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/DWARFASTParserClang.cpp
@@ -2963,9 +2963,9 @@ void DWARFASTParserClang::ParseSingleMember(
// whereas GCC emits it only for static data members if not part of an
// anonymous namespace. The flag that is consistently emitted for static
// data members is DW_AT_declaration, so we check it instead.
- // FIXME: Since DWARFv5, static data members are marked DW_AT_variable so we
+ // The following block is only necessary to support DWARFv4 and earlier.
+ // Starting with DWARFv5, static data members are marked DW_AT_variable so we
// can consistently detect them on both GCC and Clang without below heuristic.
- // Remove this block if we ever drop DWARFv4 support.
if (attrs.member_byte_offset == UINT32_MAX &&
attrs.data_bit_offset == UINT64_MAX && attrs.is_declaration) {
CreateStaticMemberVariable(die, attrs, class_clang_type);
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72495
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list