[Lldb-commits] [lldb] Fix a bug with cancelling "attach -w" after you have run a process previously (PR #65822)

[via lldb-commits]

https://github.com/bulbazord commented:

Idea seems good to me. I have similar concerns to Adrian but overall I think I'm on board with this idea. I'm kind of confused why we don't destroy the old Process object after it's exited though, wouldn't properly cleaning up after ourselves solve a lot of this issue? Or is there something I don't understand about the lifecycle of Process?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65822