[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D158010: [lldb] Allow synthetic providers in C++ and fix linking problems

Lily Orth-Smith via Phabricator via lldb-commits lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Aug 15 13:45:19 PDT 2023


electriclilies added inline comments.


================
Comment at: lldb/source/Commands/CommandObjectType.cpp:2174
 
-#if LLDB_ENABLE_PYTHON
-
----------------
jingham wrote:
> electriclilies wrote:
> > rriddle wrote:
> > > Why is this dropped?
> > Walter and I want to use the synthetic types from C++, but right now it's only supported in Python. The motivation behind this is to make it so that we can actually use the synthetic types. 
> Just to be clear.  There are already lots of synthetic child providers implemented in C++ in in lldb already (look for CXXSyntheticChildren constructors in CPlusPlusLanguage.cpp for instance).  
> 
> I think what you are saying is that you are removing the restriction that you have to BUILD lldb with Python in order to add C++ implemented summaries.  If that's indeed what you are saying, then this is fine, since that seems an odd restriction...
> 
> But it would be nice to have some kind of testing that this actually works, since I don't think any of our bots build lldb w/o Python.
Yes that's exactly it! I agree it would be nice to have a test for it but I don't know how to add it. 


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D158010/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D158010



More information about the lldb-commits mailing list