[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D154271: [lldb] Fix data race when interacting with python scripts
Jonas Devlieghere via Phabricator via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sat Jul 1 16:32:44 PDT 2023
JDevlieghere requested changes to this revision.
JDevlieghere added inline comments.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/ScriptInterpreter/Python/ScriptInterpreterPythonImpl.h:386
+ // to add 1 to its return value.
+ return m_lock_count.fetch_add(1, std::memory_order_relaxed) + 1;
+ }
----------------
Sorry if my previous comment wasn't clear. `std::atomic` provides these operators so the old code was fine: https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/atomic/atomic/operator_arith
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/ScriptInterpreter/Python/ScriptInterpreterPythonImpl.h:390-398
+ // std::atomic::fetch_sub is an atomic post-decrement operation so we need
+ // to subtract 1 from its return value.
+ uint32_t count = m_lock_count.fetch_sub(1, std::memory_order_relaxed) - 1;
+ if (static_cast<int32_t>(count) < 0) {
+ // Handle underflow here & reset count to zero.
+ count = 0;
+ m_lock_count.store(count, std::memory_order_relaxed);
----------------
What you do here isn't safe. Nothing is preventing the atomic value from being modified between the `fetch_sub` and the `store` and there is no atomic operation that does a less-than-compare-and-store. I don't think you can keep the current behavior with just an atomic.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D154271/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D154271
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list