[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D145609: [lldb] Change dwim-print to default to disabled persistent results
Dave Lee via Phabricator via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Mar 23 10:22:32 PDT 2023
kastiglione added a comment.
> Also `--persistent-result on` can't be passed to print, it only works for me if I run specifically `dwim-print`. Is that intended?
The intension is that for users who want persistent results enabled can do so by customizing their `p` or `print` alias, like so:
command unalias print
command alias print dwim-print --persistent-result on --
> What was the rationale for this change? It changes the output format of a common command (given that `print` is now an alias for `dwim-print`) and it breaks basically anything that examines debugger output.
Are you using persistent results? If not, how much effort is it to either 1) change the tools/code that examine the output to not look for `$\d+`, or 2) use a custom `print`/`p` alias? Honest question.
The rationale is: `dwim-print` doesn't always use expression evaluation, it prefers to use `frame variable` where possible. In the future it could be expanded, for example to print register as well. Because `dwim-print` doesn't always use `expression`, there isn't always a persistent result. To make `dwim-print` output consistent, and because it's presumed most users don't use persistent results, we changed `dwim-print` to default to no persistent results. By consistent output, I mean that if a user runs `print someVar` and then follows that by running `print someVar.dump()`, it could be confusing if the first command doesn't have a persistent result, but the second one does.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D145609/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D145609
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list