[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D137337: Replace LLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX by CMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR
serge via Phabricator via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Nov 9 05:18:44 PST 2022
serge-sans-paille added inline comments.
================
Comment at: bolt/lib/RuntimeLibs/RuntimeLibrary.cpp:32
SmallString<128> LibPath = llvm::sys::path::parent_path(Dir);
- llvm::sys::path::append(LibPath, "lib" LLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX);
+ llvm::sys::path::append(LibPath, CMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR);
if (!llvm::sys::fs::exists(LibPath)) {
----------------
Ericson2314 wrote:
> mgorny wrote:
> > Well, one thing I immediately notice is that technically `CMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR` can be an absolute path, while in many locations you are assuming it will always be relative. Not saying that's a blocker but I think you should add checks for that into `CMakeLists.txt`.
> Yes I was working on this, and I intend to use `CMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR` with an absolute path.
>
> OK if this isn't supported initially but we should ovoid regressing where possible.
Turns out LLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX is used in several situations: (a) for the library install dir or (b) for the location where build artifact as stored in CMAKE_BINARY_DIR. (a) could accept a path but not (b), unless we derive it from (a) but I can see a lot of complication there for the testing step. Would that be ok to choke on CMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR being a path and not a directory component?
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D137337/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D137337
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list