[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D129814: Fix stepping over watchpoints in architectures that raise the exception before executing the instruction

Pavel Labath via Phabricator via lldb-commits lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Jul 15 01:43:55 PDT 2022


labath added a comment.

In D129814#3654276 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D129814#3654276>, @jasonmolenda wrote:

> In D129814#3654230 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D129814#3654230>, @labath wrote:
>
>> Generally, this makes sense to me, but I do have one question (not necessarily for Jim). These tests work on (arm) linux, and I am wondering why is that the case. Could it be related to the fact that lldb-server preserves the stop reason for threads that are not running? I.e. if we have two threads hit a breakpoint (or whatever), and then step one of them, then the other thread will still report a stop_reason=breakpoint. Do you know if this is supposed to happen (e.g. does debugserver do that)?
>
> I'd have to go back and test it to be 100% sure but from the behavior I see on Darwin systems, when we receive a watchpoint hit on two threads at the same time, and instruction-step the first thread, when we ask debugserver for the current stop-reason on thread two, it says there is no reason.  The watchpoint exception on the second thread is lost.  I could imagine lldb-server behaving differently. (I think when we fetch the mach exceptions for the threads, they've now been delivered, and when we ask the kernel for any pending mach exceptions for the threads a second time -- even if those threads haven't been allowed to run, I think the state is lost, and debugserver didn't save that initial state it received.)

Yes, that sounds plausible. It lldb-server (on linux) it happens differently because we store each stop reason inside the thread object, and since we can control each thread independently, there's no reason to touch it if we're not running the thread. Although it also wouldn't be hard to clear in on every resume.

So which one of these behaviors would you say is the correct one?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D129814/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D129814



More information about the lldb-commits mailing list