[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D111409: proposed support for Java interface to Scripting Bridge

[Jim Ingham via Phabricator via lldb-commits]

jingham added a comment.

Sounds good.  When we started adding extension points for python, we made the implementations be free functions.  But then over time we realized it was often more convenient if you had a object managing the callback, that way it could more easily store state over the invocations, etc.  If doing free functions is harder in Java, I think it would be fine to only implement the "class with an invocation method" version of the callback.


Repository:
  rLLDB LLDB

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D111409/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D111409