[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D105166: Fix expression evaluation result expansion in lldb-vscode

jeffrey tan via Phabricator via lldb-commits lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jul 20 18:57:16 PDT 2021


yinghuitan added inline comments.


================
Comment at: lldb/tools/lldb-vscode/VSCode.h:83
 
+struct Variables {
+  // Bit mask to tell if a variableReference is inside
----------------
wallace wrote:
> yinghuitan wrote:
> > wallace wrote:
> > > Move it to a new file and add a global comment explaining the different kinds of variables that exist
> > I can do this in future refactoring. I am doing pragmatic refactoring here without delaying fixing the important bug.
> this bug has been around probably for years, so I think it's reasonable to spend a few minutes polishing the code and delivering something nicer. Otherwise we might never do any refactor.
> 
> Besides, don't forget to add some top-level documentation in this class explaining the difference in variables and how they work in lldb-vscode. It'll be very useful for future improvements, as it's not intuitive to figure out some of the details.
I disagree. The bug is not years but a recent VScode protocol timing/sequence change caused regression. The point is not about several minutes time but focusing on big picture -- I am fixing a very important bug in lldb which prevents users from using watch window in VScode. Everyone has different opinion about refactoring or make its better. We can keep on iterating but I think landing the change to unblock users is more important at this point.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D105166/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D105166



More information about the lldb-commits mailing list