[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D102085: Add an "interrupt timeout" to Process, fix a bug in handling interrupt timeouts in

[Jim Ingham via Phabricator via lldb-commits]

jingham added a comment.

BTW, I generally agree that passing values in parameters that are always going to be used internally anyway is ugly and it's better to store them in an ivar.  But in this case, the value was going to get used in some cases and not in others, which storing it as a parameter would have hidden.  That's what I was trying to avoid.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D102085/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D102085