[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D100965: [lldb] Refactor argument group by SourceLocationSpec (NFCI)
Jim Ingham via Phabricator via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Apr 27 10:17:26 PDT 2021
jingham added a comment.
In D100965#2716239 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D100965#2716239>, @teemperor wrote:
> I am wondering how SourceLocationSpec is related to lldb's Declaration class (which is FileSpec + line + column and describes a location in source code)? It seems like the current SourceLocationSpec is just a Declaration with the two additional search variables (and the first iteration was exactly the same as Declaration).
>
> Could we maybe turn SourceLocationSpec to store a lldb::Declaration instead of file/line/column? I'm aware that the Declaration class first needs some cleanup (and a removal of that #ifdef around column....), but right now we are already using Declarations in a bunch of places to describe source locations.
Seems to me Declarations and SourceLocationSpec's are different things. A Declaration describes just where something is in a source file. And moreover, there need to be a lot of them, since every function, type etc has one. So you might be concerned about size for this entity.
A SourceLocationSpec (maybe we should make a better name?) is about specifying how you search for a source location (e.g. to set a breakpoint on it.) Declarations don't need "include_inlines" or "exact_match" or anything else we might end up adding to specify how to look for matches against a source line specification somebody used in break set or other places.
So I don't think it makes sense to conflate the two.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D100965/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D100965
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list