[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D100191: [lldb] [llgs] Support owning and detaching extra processes
Pavel Labath via Phabricator via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Apr 14 12:02:36 PDT 2021
labath added a comment.
We should also start thinking about tests. I suppose the smallest piece of functionality that could be usefully tested (with a lldb-server test) is debugging a process that forks, stopping after the fork, and detaching from the child. Shall we try making that work first?
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/Process/gdb-remote/GDBRemoteCommunicationServerLLGS.cpp:3249
+ if (!detached)
+ return SendErrorResponse(Status("PID %" PRIu64 " not traced", pid));
----------------
mgorny wrote:
> labath wrote:
> > Open question: Should we return an error for a plain `D` packet, if we don't have _any_ processes around?
> Practically, it probably doesn't matter. However, if client sends `D` without actually having process attached, then something has probably gone wrong, so might make sense to return some error.
True. I suppose we could just go with whatever falls out naturally from the code, and not add any special code on account of that.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D100191/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D100191
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list