[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D82863: [LLDB] Add support to resize SVE registers at run-time
Pavel Labath via Phabricator via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jan 14 01:24:11 PST 2021
labath added a comment.
Thanks for your patience. I think this is in a pretty good shape now. Just a couple of quick questions inline...
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/Process/gdb-remote/GDBRemoteRegisterContext.cpp:410
+ if (success && do_reconfigure_arm64_sve &&
+ GetPrimordialRegister(reg_info, gdb_comm))
+ AArch64SVEReconfigure();
----------------
Could we move the `GetPrimordialRegister` part into `AArch64SVEReconfigure`? The function looks up the "vg" number again anyway?
Actually, why is this even needed? Wouldn't the `ReadRegisterAsUnsigned(vg_reg_num)` call inside `AArch64SVEReconfigure` already handle the reading aspect?
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/Process/gdb-remote/GDBRemoteRegisterContext.cpp:752-753
+ // Make a heap based buffer that is big enough to store all registers
+ DataBufferSP reg_data_sp(
+ new DataBufferHeap(m_reg_info_sp->GetRegisterDataByteSize(), 0));
+
----------------
```
auto reg_data_sp = std::make_shared<DataBufferHeap>(m_reg_info_sp->GetRegisterDataByteSize(), 0);
```
Or maybe even drop the local var and move directly into the `SetData` call.
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/Process/gdb-remote/GDBRemoteRegisterContext.cpp:755
+
+ m_reg_data.Clear();
+ m_reg_data.SetData(reg_data_sp);
----------------
Is Clear before SetData really needed?
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D82863/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D82863
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list