[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D93874: [process] fix exec support on Linux
walter erquinigo via Phabricator via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jan 4 14:40:09 PST 2021
wallace added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lldb/test/API/functionalities/exec/TestExec.py:96
# Run and we should stop due to exec
process.Continue()
----------------
clayborg wrote:
> Do we need this continue if we did the step above? How does this test still work if the step was supposed to step over the exec?
It seems to me that the StepInstruction before happens before the exec is reached, and after this process.Continue() exec will be reached
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D93874/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D93874
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list