[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D93421: Fix how ValueObject deals with getting unsigned values
Raphael Isemann via Phabricator via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Dec 17 09:19:01 PST 2020
teemperor added a comment.
I just realized that I got the char sign also mixed up. It's an `unsigned char` in LLDB, so the 255 is wrong (But I believe our char signedness handling is not correct in any C language). But the fact that we don't print YES/NO for that bitfield is right (just the int value is wrong).
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
More information about the lldb-commits