[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D93421: Fix how ValueObject deals with getting unsigned values

[Raphael Isemann via Phabricator via lldb-commits]

teemperor added a comment.

I just realized that I got the char sign also mixed up. It's an `unsigned char` in LLDB, so the 255 is wrong (But I believe our char signedness handling is not correct in any C language). But the fact that we don't print YES/NO for that bitfield is right (just the int value is wrong).


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D93421/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D93421