[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D86220: [lldb/Utility] Simplify Scalar handling of float types
Pavel Labath via Phabricator via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Aug 20 07:18:46 PDT 2020
labath marked an inline comment as done.
labath added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Utility/Scalar.cpp:68
+Scalar::PromotionKey Scalar::GetFloatPromoKey(const llvm::fltSemantics &sem) {
+ static const llvm::fltSemantics *order[] = {&APFloat::IEEEsingle(),
+ &APFloat::IEEEdouble(),
----------------
JDevlieghere wrote:
> `std::array` or `ArrayRef` maybe?
With a std::array, I'd have to explicitly specify the size, and I'm _really_ not sure what would happen with an ArrayRef (I think it would end up as a dangling pointer).
Given that it has just one usage, I don't think this is an issue. Even with multiple usages, I think it'd be fine to declare the variable this way, but that have an accessor which would wrap it in an ArrayRef for easier manipulation.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D86220/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D86220
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list