[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D84210: [lldb] Use a weak pointer to hold on to the underlying thread plan in SBThreadPlan

[Jim Ingham via Phabricator via lldb-commits]

jingham added a comment.

Yes, the only way you can get your hands on an SBThreadPlan is in the process of queueing one, so the ThreadPlan stack will always be the one to manage the lifecycle of a plan.  And if an SBThreadPlan represents a ThreadPlan that has been discarded, it should convert back to an empty SBThreadPlan rather than keeping the underlying plan alive.  So this is correct.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D84210/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D84210