[Lldb-commits] [lldb] 90c1af1 - [lldb][NFC] Add more test for builtin formats
Eric Christopher via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sat Jun 20 14:22:53 PDT 2020
This is failing on some of the debian buildbots so I've temporarily
reverted it here:
commit 10b43541360efb35a1d33e9cf1e93023ebd69b15 (HEAD -> master,
origin/master, origin/HEAD)
Author: Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com>
Date: Sat Jun 20 14:21:42 2020
Temporarily Revert "[lldb][NFC] Add more test for builtin formats"
as it's failing on the debian buildbots:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-debian/builds/12531
This reverts commit 90c1af106a20785ffd01c0d6a41db8bc0160fd11.
buildbot link:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-debian/builds/12531
Sorry for any inconvenience.
-eric
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 12:35 PM Raphael Isemann via lldb-commits <
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> Author: Raphael Isemann
> Date: 2020-06-20T19:31:40+02:00
> New Revision: 90c1af106a20785ffd01c0d6a41db8bc0160fd11
>
> URL:
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/90c1af106a20785ffd01c0d6a41db8bc0160fd11
> DIFF:
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/90c1af106a20785ffd01c0d6a41db8bc0160fd11.diff
>
> LOG: [lldb][NFC] Add more test for builtin formats
>
> The previous tests apparently missed a few code branches in
> DumpDataExtractor
> code. Also renames the 'test_instruction' which had the same name as
> another
> test (and Python therefore ignored the test entirely).
>
> Added:
>
>
> Modified:
>
> lldb/test/API/functionalities/data-formatter/builtin-formats/TestBuiltinFormats.py
>
> Removed:
>
>
>
>
> ################################################################################
> diff --git
> a/lldb/test/API/functionalities/data-formatter/builtin-formats/TestBuiltinFormats.py
> b/lldb/test/API/functionalities/data-formatter/builtin-formats/TestBuiltinFormats.py
> index 9fefae6bbf5c..1a413a13986a 100644
> ---
> a/lldb/test/API/functionalities/data-formatter/builtin-formats/TestBuiltinFormats.py
> +++
> b/lldb/test/API/functionalities/data-formatter/builtin-formats/TestBuiltinFormats.py
> @@ -42,6 +42,9 @@ def test(self):
> self.assertIn("= 0\n", self.getFormatted("float", "0"))
> self.assertIn("= 2\n", self.getFormatted("float", "0x40000000"))
> self.assertIn("= NaN\n", self.getFormatted("float", "-1"))
> + # Checks the float16 code.
> + self.assertIn("= 2\n", self.getFormatted("float",
> "(__UINT16_TYPE__)0x4000"))
> + self.assertIn("= error: unsupported byte size (1) for float
> format\n", self.getFormatted("float", "'a'"))
>
> # enumeration
> self.assertIn("= 0\n", self.getFormatted("enumeration", "0"))
> @@ -59,6 +62,13 @@ def test(self):
>
> # octal
> self.assertIn("= 04553207\n", self.getFormatted("octal",
> "1234567"))
> + self.assertIn("= 0221505317046536757\n",
> self.getFormatted("octal", "(__uint128_t)0x123456789ABDEFull"))
> +
> + # complex float
> + self.assertIn("= error: unsupported byte size (1) for complex
> float format\n", self.getFormatted("complex float", "'a'"))
> +
> + # complex integer
> + self.assertIn("= error: unsupported byte size (1) for complex
> integer format\n", self.getFormatted("complex integer", "'a'"))
>
> # hex
> self.assertIn("= 0x00abc123\n", self.getFormatted("hex",
> "0xABC123"))
> @@ -86,6 +96,17 @@ def test(self):
> self.assertIn('= " \\U0000001b\\a\\b\\f\\n\\r\\t\\vaA09"\n',
> self.getFormatted("OSType", "cstring"))
> self.assertIn('= " \\U0000001b\\a\\b\\f\\n\\r\\t\\vaA09"\n',
> self.getFormatted("unicode8", "cstring"))
>
> + # FIXME: Passing a 'const char *' will ignore any given format,
> + # so we have to repeat the tests with a void* casts to actually
> test our formats.
> + self.assertIn('= \\x9a\\x0f\\0\\0\\x01\\0\\0\\0\n',
> self.getFormatted("character array", "(void *)cstring"))
> + self.assertIn('= \\x9a\\x0f\\0\\0\\x01\\0\\0\\0\n',
> self.getFormatted("character", "(void *)cstring"))
> + self.assertIn('= " \\e\\a\\b\\f\\n\\r\\t\\vaA09"\n',
> self.getFormatted("c-string", "(void *)cstring"))
> + # FIXME: Ignores the printables characters at the end.
> + self.assertIn('= ........\n', self.getFormatted("printable
> character", "(void *)cstring"))
> + self.assertIn('= \'\\0\\0\\0\\x01\\0\\0\\x0f\\x9a\'\n',
> self.getFormatted("OSType", "(void *)cstring"))
> + # FIXME: This should print a string.
> + self.assertIn('= 0x0000000100000f9a\n',
> self.getFormatted("unicode8", "(void *)cstring"))
> +
> self.assertIn('= \\0\\0\\0\\0\\0\\0\\0\\0\n',
> self.getFormatted("character array", "(__UINT64_TYPE__)0"))
> self.assertIn('= \\0\\0\\0\\0\\0\\0\\0\\0\n',
> self.getFormatted("character", "(__UINT64_TYPE__)0"))
> self.assertIn('=\n', self.getFormatted("c-string",
> "(__UINT64_TYPE__)0"))
> @@ -137,6 +158,11 @@ def test(self):
> # There is not int128_t[] style, so this only tests uint128_t[].
> self.assertIn("= {0x00000000000000000123456789abcdef}\n",
> self.getFormatted("uint128_t[]", "__uint128_t i = 0x123456789ABCDEF; i"))
>
> + # Different fixed-width float type arrays.
> + self.assertIn("{2 2}\n", self.getFormatted("float16[]",
> "0x40004000"))
> + self.assertIn("{2 2}\n", self.getFormatted("float32[]",
> "0x4000000040000000ll"))
> + self.assertIn("{2 0}\n", self.getFormatted("float64[]",
> "__uint128_t i = 0x4000000000000000ll; i"))
> +
> # Invalid format string
> self.expect("expr --format invalid_format_string -- 1",
> error=True,
> substrs=["error: Invalid format character or name
> 'invalid_format_string'. Valid values are:"])
> @@ -144,10 +170,12 @@ def test(self):
> # Extends to host target pointer width.
> @skipIf(archs=no_match(['x86_64']))
> @no_debug_info_test
> - def test_instruction(self):
> + def test_pointer(self):
> # pointer
> self.assertIn("= 0x000000000012d687\n",
> self.getFormatted("pointer", "1234567"))
> self.assertIn("= 0x0000000000000000\n",
> self.getFormatted("pointer", "0"))
> + # FIXME: Just ignores the input value as it's not pointer sized.
> + self.assertIn("= 0x0000000000000000\n",
> self.getFormatted("pointer", "'a'"))
>
> # Depends on the host target for decoding.
> @skipIf(archs=no_match(['x86_64']))
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lldb-commits mailing list
> lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-commits/attachments/20200620/1bde8554/attachment.html>
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list