[Lldb-commits] [lldb] cbfae97 - [LLDB] Mark TestCreateDuringInstructionStep as flaky on Linux

Omair Javaid via lldb-commits lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jun 3 04:20:41 PDT 2020


On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 14:36, Pavel Labath <pavel at labath.sk> wrote:

> On 02/06/2020 11:10, Muhammad Omair Javaid via lldb-commits wrote:
> >
> > Author: Muhammad Omair Javaid
> > Date: 2020-06-02T14:08:28+05:00
> > New Revision: cbfae97ca82b11ab2b54562055c49817baa1e26b
> >
> > URL:
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cbfae97ca82b11ab2b54562055c49817baa1e26b
> > DIFF:
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cbfae97ca82b11ab2b54562055c49817baa1e26b.diff
> >
> > LOG: [LLDB] Mark TestCreateDuringInstructionStep as flaky on Linux
> >
> > This patch marks TestCreateDuringInstructionStep.py as flakey for Linux.
> > This is failing randomly on arm/aarch64. I will monitor buildbot and
> > skip it if it fails again.
> >
>
> Hi Omair,
>
> I'd like to note two things:
> - I haven't seen this fail on x86 in a very long time. So, whatever the
> problem is, it seems limited to arm architectures
> - since we've switched to using lit as the test driver, I believe the
> "flaky" decorators don't actually do anything (we should really delete
> them if that's the case).
>
> So all in all, I believe you're better off just skipping this on
> arm+aarch64 until someone can investigate this -- which I am hoping will
> not be too hard, given that this fails fairly frequently.
>

Ack. I have marked it skipped as it was sporadically failing only on
arm/linux. Passes all the time if run independently.


>
> pl
>


-- 
Omair Javaid
www.linaro.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-commits/attachments/20200603/0cf48a5b/attachment.html>


More information about the lldb-commits mailing list