[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D77327: [nfc] [lldb] 2/2: Introduce DWARF callbacks

Pavel Labath via Phabricator via lldb-commits lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Apr 7 08:39:53 PDT 2020


labath added inline comments.


================
Comment at: lldb/include/lldb/Core/UniqueCStringMap.h:130-163
+  bool GetValues(ConstString unique_cstr,
+                 std::function<bool(T value)> callback) const {
+    for (const Entry &entry : llvm::make_range(std::equal_range(
+             m_map.begin(), m_map.end(), unique_cstr, Compare())))
+      if (callback(entry.value))
+        return true;
+
----------------
jankratochvil wrote:
> jankratochvil wrote:
> > labath wrote:
> > > I'm not sure these functions are really needed. They have just one caller, and they'd be trivial if this class provided appropriate abstractions. Maybe just add begin/end/equal_range methods, so that one can write:
> > > ```
> > > for (value: map / map.equal_range(str))
> > >   stuff
> > > ```
> > > ?
> > > 
> > > (ideally, I'd like to have iterators instead of callbacks for the index classes too, but iterators and class hierarchies don't mix very well)
> > Do you mean the standard iteration:
> > ```
> > for (std::pair<ConstString, DIERef> pair : map)
> >   stuff;
> > ```
> > or really
> > ```
> > for (DIERef ref : map)
> >   stuff;
> > ```
> > ?
> > 
> Implemented. IIUC for regexes it should be matched in a caller - or to make also an iterator for regexes?
> ```
>   for (const auto &entry : m_map.equal_range(name))
>     if (callback(entry.value))
> ```
> ```
>   for (const auto &entry : m_map)
>     if (regex.Execute(entry.cstring.GetCString())) {
>       if (callback(entry.value))
> ```
> 
Yes, that is correct.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D77327/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D77327





More information about the lldb-commits mailing list