[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D76168: CPlusPlusNameParser does not handles templated operator< properly
Pavel Labath via Phabricator via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Mar 18 09:14:28 PDT 2020
labath added a comment.
In D76168#1925176 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D76168#1925176>, @shafik wrote:
> Long-term I would like to modify clang to stop doing that for LLDB, but LLDB will still have to support older compilers for a while. So I think this fix is still needed.
So is this some alternative to D75761 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D75761> (where we'd use CPlusPlusNameParser to decode DW_AT_names of templates)? If so, I think that is an interesting direction, but beware that that class is kind of meant for processing the demangler output. The contents of DW_AT_name looks a bit like a demangled name, but in reality there are some deviations from that format (which is why I did not recommend this direction initially -- but I am not against it either).
Also it looks like llvm and gnu demanglers disagree on the exact formatting of demangled operator names:
$ c++filt _ZlsI1AEvT_S1_
void operator<< <A>(A, A)
$ llvm-cxxfilt _ZlsI1AEvT_S1_
void operator<<<A>(A, A)
I think the gnu format is superior (and unambiguous) so we could change llvm to match that -- and this change probably won't require any kind of compatibility hacks.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D76168/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D76168
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list